Independent Judgement

THESTRANGER’SCAR

How we learned to trust strangers, machines and stars on a screen faster than we learned to understand the danger.

"Thecrowdisoftenrightaboutwhathappened.Thecrowdisalmostalwayswrongaboutwhatitmeans.Thegapbetweenthosetwoiswhererealjudgementlives."

Scroll to read

It’s 2am. You’re standing on a corner in a city you don’t know. A car pulls up. You don’t know the driver. You’ve never seen his face before tonight. You open the door, you get in, and you tell him where you live.

Your mother spent eighteen years telling you never to do exactly this.

She was right, by the way. For two hundred thousand years she was right. Getting into a stranger’s chariot, carriage or car was one of the most dangerous things a human being could do. Then in about ten years we decided it was fine. We do it now without a flicker. We do it half asleep.

Nothing changed about the danger. A stranger is still a stranger. What changed was a small glowing rectangle that showed us a name, a photo, a number plate, and four point nine stars. That little cluster of symbols did the job that used to take a lifetime. It made a stranger feel safe.

I want to talk about trust. Specifically, the fact that we rebuilt the entire machinery of trust in about twenty years, and nobody sent us the manual.

For most of history, trust was simple. You trusted what was close and what was old. You trusted the people in your village because you’d see them again tomorrow. You trusted the baker because his father was the baker. Trust was local. It was slow. It was earned in person, over years. And it was very hard to fake, because faking it took as long as earning it.

Then we got big. Too big to know each other. So we invented a beautiful piece of technology to carry trust across distance. We called it the brand. A brand was a promise in a tin. You’d never met the people at Kellogg’s or Cadbury, but the name did the trusting for you. We moved our trust out of people and into institutions. The bank. The newspaper. The label.

Then the internet walked in and broke the institution’s monopoly on the promise.

Field Notes

Don't lose the thread.

Rachel Botsman, who studies this better than anyone, describes trust moving from the local, to the institutional, to the distributed. The distributed part is where we live now. We stopped trusting the institution and started trusting each other. Strangers rating strangers. We trust a five star average from a hundred people we’ll never meet more than we trust the company’s own advertising. We sleep in strangers’ homes. We eat strangers’ cooking. We get in the car.

Trust didn’t disappear. It went sideways. It left the building and moved into the crowd.

Here’s the thing that stops me cold. I watch my children, and they trust differently than I do. My kid asks the speaker on the kitchen counter a question, and whatever it says back, that’s the answer. Full stop. No agenda, no doubt, no idea the thing could be wrong, or selling something, or making it up.

I grew up in a world where trust was scarce. You started at no, and the world had to earn its way to yes. My children grew up in a world where trust is the default. They start at yes. For them, suspicion is the thing you have to be taught. For me it was the air.

That’s not a small difference. That’s a different species of human, raised on a different operating system.

And now we’ve arrived somewhere genuinely strange. Because the oldest tool of every con artist who ever lived was trust. The con man’s whole trade was manufacturing the signals you were built to believe. A confident voice. A familiar face. The right accent. For all of history, those signals were expensive to fake. You had to be a real talent to fake a face.

Not anymore.

There’s a scam going round right now. A parent gets a phone call. It’s their child’s voice. Crying. In trouble. Asking for money, fast. And it is not their child. It’s a machine, trained on three seconds of audio from a video their kid posted online. The voice is perfect. The fear is real. The parent sends the money.

That’s the whole problem in one phone call. We spent two hundred thousand years learning to trust a face, a voice, confidence, a quick fluent answer. We learned to trust those things because, for all of human history, they were hard to produce. They meant something. We now have machines that produce every one of those signals perfectly, instantly, for free.

The system changed overnight. We are still the same animal, reading the same signals, feeling the same pull in the same gut.

That’s the gap. Technology rewired the system of trust in twenty years. Human nature hasn’t had a software update in two hundred thousand.

Think about the handshake. The oldest piece of trust technology we have. Two people, hands open, no weapon. Here is my vulnerability, offered on purpose. We did that for ten thousand years. It worked for one reason. A hand was hard to fake. You had to actually show up. You had to actually be there.

So. Back to the corner. 2am. The car. The name, the photo, the four point nine stars.

Here’s what I’d leave you with. Trust never broke. Trust just stopped requiring time. Everything that used to take years to earn, a reputation, a face, a voice, a promise, can now be generated in a second by something that has never met you and does not care whether you live or die.

The handshake worked because hands were hard to fake.

Nothing is hard to fake anymore.

So the question is not whether we can trust the machine. The question is what we become when the signals we were built to trust can be printed on demand. Because we are still going to get in the car. We always do.

We just need to remember that the stars were never the same thing as the stranger.

Field Notes

If this made you think differently, stay close.

One email when something is worth your time. No schedule, no funnel.