In the months leading up to June 6, 1944, Allied planners drafted a three-hundred-page, minute-by-minute blueprint for the Normandy invasion. Every wave of landing craft, every paratrooper drop, and every artillery shell was calculated to the absolute second.
Within exactly six minutes of the first boots hitting Omaha Beach, that plan was dead.
Strong currents pushed landing crafts miles off target. Radio equipment drowned in the surf. Units were scattered across Normandy with no communication. Eisenhower famously observed: Plans are useless, but planning is indispensable.
The victory was not won by the plan. It was won by the junior officers on the ground who ignored the useless blueprint, analyzed the immediate chaos, and adapted in real-time.
Yet, walk into any corporate boardroom, and you will find highly paid executives committing the exact same sin. They believe that by spending six months and half a million dollars drafting a beautiful, static five-year strategic roadmap, they have secured their future.
They have not. They have just drafted an exceptionally detailed, highly polished suicide note.
The Comfort Drug of the C-Suite
Corporate strategy has become a performance art designed to comfort the anxious.
As Roger Martin argues in Playing to Win, most of what passes for strategy in the modern enterprise is actually just comforted planning. Planning is comforting because you control all the inputs. You can construct elaborate spreadsheets, schedule timelines, and assign tasks. It makes you feel like you are in control of the future.
But strategy is terrifying because you do not control the outputs. True strategy is a series of difficult, exclusive choices about where to play and how to win. It is the act of deciding what not to do.
Most corporate plans are just a list of aspirations. They are wish lists. They are a cascade of goals: increase revenue by twenty percent, expand into three new markets, launch a new product line.
This is not strategy. This is a laundry list of desires without a theory of competitive advantage.
When you mistake a list of goals for a strategy, you paralyze your organization. You lock yourself into a rigid, five-year execution cycle that cannot survive the first wave of market reality.
Field Notes
Don't lose the thread.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
The Strategic Crucible
True strategy is a brutal act of elimination.
In Good Strategy Bad Strategy, Richard Rumelt writes that a good strategy is a diagnosis of the absolute single most critical problem blocking your survival (the crux). It is a guiding policy that addresses that constraint, followed by coherent, focused actions.
If your strategy does not make several departments in your organization highly uncomfortable, you do not have a strategy. You have a compromise.
When you try to optimize every part of your organization simultaneously, you optimize nothing. As Russell Ackoff noted, a system is not the sum of its parts; it is the product of their interactions. Optimizing each department independently systematically destroys the performance of the whole.
But executives hate focus because focus requires saying no. It requires leaving opportunities behind. As the philosopher Isaiah Berlin famously wrote, to choose is to leave something behind. Some corporate values genuinely conflict, and no amount of clever management can reconcile them.
When you refuse to make those hard choices, you write a plan that tries to be everything to everyone. And when that plan meets the chaotic reality of the market, it shatters.
The Fallacy of Sustainable Advantage
The 2016 corporate playbook was built on the myth of the sustainable competitive moat. You identified a market position, built a wall around it, and defended it.
But the world has rotated.
As Rita McGrath argues in Transient Advantage, sustainable competitive advantages are gone. In a highly volatile, digitized economy, competitive advantages are fleeting. You do not win by defending a static position; you win by continuously finding, exploiting, and abandoning temporary waves of advantage.
This requires a fundamental shift in how we view the organization.
Instead of building a highly optimized, rigid machine designed to execute a single, static plan, you must build an antifragile system.
Nassim Nicholas Taleb writes that antifragile systems do not merely survive volatility, they actively benefit and grow from it. Wind extinguishes a candle but energizes a fire. You want your organization to be the fire, wishing for the wind of market disruption.
But you cannot be antifragile if you are locked into a rigid, five-year execution plan. When your metrics are tied to a fixed roadmap, you punish adaptation. You encourage your team to march straight into the surf, executing a dead plan because their bonuses are tied to the blueprint.
The Metric Trap
This brings us to Charles Goodhart’s ultimate warning: When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure.
When your static strategic plan defines specific, rigid proxy metrics as your targets (follower counts, click-through rates, or short-term conversion metrics) your team will optimize for those proxies. They will hit the target but miss the point.
They will show you a beautiful slide deck with rising graphs while the actual business is dying.
The proxy survives, but the thing that actually matters (long-term brand equity, customer pricing power, and genuine trust) goes unmeasured and unvalued.
The Velocity of the Loop
In a volatile, unpredictable market, the ultimate competitive moat is not your current strategic position. It is the velocity of your feedback loops.
It is your ability to execute, fail, learn, and adapt on the ground before your competitor even schedules their next alignment meeting.
Stop treating your strategy as a sacred text. Treat it as a temporary hypothesis.
Test the hypothesis immediately through raw, aggressive execution. Listen to the feedback from the front lines. And when the surf rises and the landing crafts are pushed off course, have the courage to throw away the plan and adapt.
After all, a beautiful, static plan is a comforting illusion. But when the battle begins, survival belongs to the fast, not the comfortable.
Field Notes
If this made you think differently, stay close.
One email when something is worth your time. No schedule, no funnel.
Free. No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.
More in Marketing After the Machine
All Essays →The Model Doesn't Know You're Good
LLMs don't recommend your brand because it's good. They recommend it because it's legible to a machine. Confusing the two is the most expensive mistake the marketing industry will make in the next five years.
9 min read
C-words in marketing: culture, community, and cult
Every industry has words it reaches for when it wants to sound like it's doing something important. Marketing has three that get passed around boardrooms like a flask at a football match: culture, community, cult.
8 min read
The $68 Billion SEO Murder: How Google Kidnapped Your Customers
Nearly sixty percent of all searches now end without a single click. The $68 billion SEO industry was built on a promise that has been quietly revoked, leaving brands to face a terrifying new reality.
7 min read